En biasbedömning är ett sätt att utvärdera hur mycket tilltro man kan ha till en studies resultat. Den identifierar potentiella källor till systematiska fel i studiedesign, dataurval, mätning eller rapportering.
Syftet är inte att avfärda forskning, utan att klargöra dess tillförlitlighet och stärka den övergripande evidensbasen.
Läs mer om biasbedömningar och de olika biaserna här .
Interventions intended to reduce the risk of wildlife-inflicted injuries or loss of human life. Evidence in this category are currently limited to interventions intended to prevent interactions with large carnivores, based on a systematic review undertaken with funding from LIFE Wild Wolf.
1
Deterrents
Deterrents are a group of interventions intended to discourage wild animals from accessing areas or resources by making the behaviour unpleasant for the animal.
2
Wildlife Removal
3
Barriers
If physical barriers are able to keep carnivores and people separate, or prevent access from wildlife to anthropogenic resources, then human-wildlife interactions and potentially dangerous situations could be prevented.
4
Guarding
Increased vigilance through actively guarding towards wildlife, or keeping company when interacting with wildlife, could function both for early detection of the interaction and as a deterrence for the wild animal. If wildlife is deterred from interacting, it is expected that injuries or deaths as a consequence of interactions are prevented.
5
Information
6
Guarding Animals
Guarding animals may be able to reduce the risk of human-wildlife interactions by alerting humans or by expressing aggression towards wildlife and function as a deterence.
7
Other